To enjoy CycleChat without adverts - Register now - it's free and easy!

Contador banned

Discussion in 'Pro Cycling and Racing' started by Nearly there, 6 Feb 2012.

    Nearly there Executive Member

    Location:
    Cumberland

    cd365 Member

    About time it was sorted

    yello Vice President

    Blimey, I wasn't expecting that! I genuinely thought he'd walk!

    Nearly there Executive Member

    Location:
    Cumberland
    I want to kick him in the nuts for dragging cycling through the mud again

    PpPete Senior Member

    Location:
    Chandler's Ford
    Out of the Olympics and this years TDF .... good,
    back in time for the Vuelta .... not so good.

    Members enjoy CycleChat without adverts - Register now - it's free and easy!

    smokeysmoo Vice President

    Location:
    Lancashire
    +1 for really surprised. Glad though if I'm honest.
    So Andy Schelck wins his first TDF, guess it's karma re-paying him for AC's attack when his chain slipped.
    Herzog and 2Loose like this.

    Noodley Keeper of the cockwombles

    Good. But it is a strange world we live in when he has been allowed to continue to race and win, then gets his wins stripped and the ban back-dated...so essentially he can be racing again in 6 months at the Vuelta.

    My view would be to strip all his wins from the date of the test, but to start the ban from the day it was imposed. Then we might see fewer riders prolonging matters with ridiculous stories of how a large cow jumped into their bed and licked their scrotums whilst they slept.

    ohnovino Large Member

    Location:
    Liverpool
    I wonder if he'll appeal? I can't really see him wanting to drag the matter out :whistle:

    rich p Executive Vice President

    Location:
    Brighton
    Good news but as Noodley says it seems perverse that he's been able to ride and ban is deemed concurrent. Stripping the results is something but slightly unsatisfactory. No doubt he'll keep protesting with the preposterous meat defence.
    Noodley likes this.

    ohnovino Large Member

    Location:
    Liverpool
    ... and presumably get paid too. It can't be right that someone who owns up straight away loses 2 years' salary, but someone who keeps denying it only loses 6 months'.

    Adrian And fyi nobody thinks im a troll actually.

    And I bet they were only pretending to be asleep.
    gaz and Noodley like this.

    Noodley Keeper of the cockwombles

    I have visions of nekkid male barristers.

    yello Vice President

    What else is new? ;)

    jdtate101 Ex Fatman

    Yes he can, but from what I understand he can't appeal against the actual case (ie doping), but can only appeal if there's been some sort of legal issue (ie mis-trial or some other such legal cockup).

    So expect this to carry on for a bit longer, whilst his legal team tries to find some 'wiggle' room on a technicality.

    fossyant Ride It Like You Stole It !

    Location:
    South Manchester
    About time !

    Keith Oates Night Watch

    I must say that I'm disappointed at the result. I know nothing about the various drugs that are being used by cyclists but from what I've read that amount found was so small as to not have any affect on his performance so it begs the question, why did he take it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    rich p Executive Vice President

    Location:
    Brighton
    Blimey Keith - we've done this one somany times!!!!!!!!

    Either through contaminated supplements, contaminated meat or a blood transfusion using blood he'd stored earlier which was already contaminated with clenbuterol. Take your pick.

    Alun Executive Member

    Location:
    Liverpool
    That would be a three and a half year ban, which would see the TdF declared as non compliant with WADA's policy, like our own BOA.

    rich p Executive Vice President

    Location:
    Brighton
    Except that he hasn't been banned for 18 months - he's been racing and earning.
    ohnovino likes this.

    Alun Executive Member

    Location:
    Liverpool
    Guilty, two year ban. At last!
    How many other riders had as much or more clenbutamol in their system, but walked free because their blood was tested at a different lab, which couldn't detect such a minute amount. The UCI need to set a level playing field, if not by use of a threshold then by some other means.

Share This Page